Post by Olddog on Jan 13, 2010 4:50:35 GMT -5
www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015
>
> Subject: Obama Takes First Step in Banning All
> Firearms
>
> On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a
> Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States
>
> On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first
> major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the
> United States. The Obama administration intends to
> force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons
> for US citizens through the signing of international
> treaties with foreign nations. By signing
> international treaties on gun control, the Obama
> administration can use the US State Department to
> bypass the normal legislative process in Congress.
> Once the US Government signs these international
> treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those
> gun laws created by foreign governments. These are
> laws that have been developed and promoted by
> organizations such as the United Nations and
> individuals such as George Soros and Michael
> Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to
> lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all
> firearms.
>
> The Obama administration is attempting to use
> tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict
> major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens
> even understand what has happened. Obama can appear
> before the public and tell them that he does not
> intend to pursue any legislation (in the United
> States) that will lead to new gun control laws,
> while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State,
> Hillary Clinton is committing the US to
> international treaties and foreign gun control laws.
> Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it
> means is that there will be no publicized gun
> control debates in the media or votes in Congress.
> We will wake up one morning and find that the United
> States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm
> and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the
> public. We will wake up another morning and find
> that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any
> transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will
> wake up yet another morning and find that the US has
> signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver
> any firearm they own to the local government
> collection and destruction center or face
> imprisonment.
>
> This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as
> government health care will be forced on us by the
> Obama administration through whatever means
> necessary, so will gun control.
>
> Read the Article
>
> U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms
> trade
>
> WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed
> policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching
> talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as
> the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics
> said gave every nation a veto.
>
> The decision, announced in a statement released by
> the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of
> former President George W. Bush's administration,
> which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that
> national controls were better.
>
> The Full Article
>
> www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015
>
> Subject: Obama Takes First Step in Banning All
> Firearms
>
> On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a
> Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States
>
> On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first
> major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the
> United States. The Obama administration intends to
> force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons
> for US citizens through the signing of international
> treaties with foreign nations. By signing
> international treaties on gun control, the Obama
> administration can use the US State Department to
> bypass the normal legislative process in Congress.
> Once the US Government signs these international
> treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those
> gun laws created by foreign governments. These are
> laws that have been developed and promoted by
> organizations such as the United Nations and
> individuals such as George Soros and Michael
> Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to
> lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all
> firearms.
>
> The Obama administration is attempting to use
> tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict
> major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens
> even understand what has happened. Obama can appear
> before the public and tell them that he does not
> intend to pursue any legislation (in the United
> States) that will lead to new gun control laws,
> while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State,
> Hillary Clinton is committing the US to
> international treaties and foreign gun control laws.
> Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it
> means is that there will be no publicized gun
> control debates in the media or votes in Congress.
> We will wake up one morning and find that the United
> States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm
> and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the
> public. We will wake up another morning and find
> that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any
> transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will
> wake up yet another morning and find that the US has
> signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver
> any firearm they own to the local government
> collection and destruction center or face
> imprisonment.
>
> This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as
> government health care will be forced on us by the
> Obama administration through whatever means
> necessary, so will gun control.
>
> Read the Article
>
> U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms
> trade
>
> WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed
> policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching
> talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as
> the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics
> said gave every nation a veto.
>
> The decision, announced in a statement released by
> the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of
> former President George W. Bush's administration,
> which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that
> national controls were better.
>
> The Full Article
>
> www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015