Post by Kt29 on Jan 15, 2010 14:06:24 GMT -5
optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com/
optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com/#/ocw-vs-ladder/4529811360
For you handloaders. This looks like an interesting method to try out if you already have not done so. Myself, I haven't tried it yet, but plan on doing so.
Before the last blizzard I was able to get out and test some loads for the 1885 using the OCW type method of load development. I must say, it is a fun method to use, more so than the Ladder method. I was encouraged by the results of the test, though a lot more testing will be in order to confirm my results, or I could just call it good. Nah, it's way more fun to go out and do some more shooting. My next test for this load will be to take load #4 with the powder charge used in that test, and vary the seating depth to see what performs best at longer ranges. I will test these rounds at 200 yards.
optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com/#/ocw-vs-ladder/4529811360
For you handloaders. This looks like an interesting method to try out if you already have not done so. Myself, I haven't tried it yet, but plan on doing so.
Before the last blizzard I was able to get out and test some loads for the 1885 using the OCW type method of load development. I must say, it is a fun method to use, more so than the Ladder method. I was encouraged by the results of the test, though a lot more testing will be in order to confirm my results, or I could just call it good. Nah, it's way more fun to go out and do some more shooting. My next test for this load will be to take load #4 with the powder charge used in that test, and vary the seating depth to see what performs best at longer ranges. I will test these rounds at 200 yards.
